eye-3-yellow-3d-2-new-logo philly_kyw_new philly_94wip_new 35h_cbssportsrad_philly philly_wpht_new

PA Targets 5 Electricity Suppliers For Deceptive Marketing

View Comments
jim-donovan-web Jim Donovan
Jim Donovan is a 13-time Emmy Award-winning consumer reporter w...
Read More

By Jim Donovan

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) — Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane today announced that the Bureau of Consumer Protection and the Office of Consumer Advocate have filed joint complaints against five out-of-state electric generation suppliers before the Public Utility Commission, after some consumers complained their electricity costs increased by as much as 300 percent.

The joint complaints seek to have the PUC suspend or revoke the licenses of the following suppliers and impose civil penalties, as well as provide appropriate restitution including any necessary refunds: Energy Services Providers Inc. d/b/a Pennsylvania Gas & Electric; IDT Energy Inc.; Respond Power LLC; Hiko Energy LLC; and Blue Pilot Energy LLC.

The joint complaints allege that the suppliers enticed consumers by promising low or “competitive” rates if the consumer switched suppliers. The actions also allege that the prices charged to customers were not reflective of the cost to serve residential electricity needs.

Between late February and mid-June, the Office of Attorney General received 42,603 telephone calls and 7,551 consumer complaints about electricity spikes. During that same time period, the Office of Consumer Advocate received more than 3,000 contacts from consumers.

The suppliers are accused of multiple violations of the Public Utility Commission’s orders and regulations, the Public Utility Code, the Consumer Protection Law and the Telemarketer Registration Act.

The Bureau of Consumer Protection found that many consumers complained that their electricity supplier was switched without their consent. The unauthorized switching of electricity suppliers is considered “slamming” and is a violation of the PUC Regulations and the Consumer Protection Law.

The actions also allege that consumers were provided with copies of contracts or terms and conditions pages that did not comply with the Telemarketer Registration Act.

View Comments
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32,017 other followers