Part 4: Can We Fix It?

KYW Regional Affairs Council

“Princes & Paupers”


By Pat Loeb

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) — Numerous polls show that Americans, with the steepest income gap of any developed country,  are concerned about the growing trend but are divided over what to do about it.

“Occupy Philadelphia” called attention to income inequality but, as critics noted, they didn’t have a solution.  They’re hardly alone.

“I don’t think there’s an easy answer to that question — unfortunately,” says Charles Plosser, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.  Plosser says solutions will be long-term and complicated.  And most economists agree they’ll require changes in public policy.

stull side  loeb Part 4:  Can We Fix It?

(Temple Univ. professor Bill Stull. Credit: Pat Loeb)

Temple University economics professor Bill Stull says the free market created the disparity between the rich and poor, so it’s unlikely to correct itself.

“No, absolutely not — it’s defintely not going to correct itself!” Stull said recently.

The problem is that the most efficient tool government has to flatten incomes is tax policy, and that has become almost impossible to use — at least in favor of the poor.  But, as Pennsylvania state senator Vincent Hughes notes, it is used to help the already wealthy.

Story continues below photo…

discount shopper getty 129752454 Part 4:  Can We Fix It?

(A woman shops at a discount store in Reading, Pa. Credit: Spencer Platt/ Getty Images)


“The Marcellus shale industry is making hundreds of millions of dollars, and they’re paying no taxes right now,” Hughes says. “There’s a $300-million tax break for the largest corporations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that the governor provided in his last budget.”

Hughes doesn’t understand why middle-income earners oppose taxes on the wealthy that would help them, but Professor Stull has a theory:

“What a lot of people are looking at are the people right behind them — they don’t want them to get a nickel.  They’re a hundred percent more concerned with the people that are nipping on their heels than they are with Warren Buffet.”

That may be the reason that income inequality is likely to remain an issue for a long, long time.

Listen to the podcast…

More from Pat Loeb
  • Somerdale Dave

    I’m not sure why I’m writing. I’ll either be ignored or told off for being part of the problem.
    I spent 32 years developing computer systems only to be repeatedly downsized as companies moved to newer languages with less expensive developers. The last time I was downsized I went to a presentation by my local community college where for six months study and $6k I could learn the new languages and qualify for jobs that COULD PAY UP TO $30k. Since I had been making more than twice that I considered it an insult and instead took a job which paid $24k without getting additional training.
    However, for years I have felt guilty about what I did. The systems I developed helped management increase profits by reducing staff (no I got no bonuses for this). While I was working I couldn’t do anything about it because I was raising a handicapped child and needed the money for medical equipment and other expenses. Now that I’m retired I’m living on social security and savings and refusing part time work so others who need the money more than I do can work. Yes, this means no vacations and a limited entertainment budget. Shortly we will have to sell our house to enhance our retirement savings.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Taz Goes Big!
Download Now!

Listen Live